钮枯碌
幼苗
共回答了16个问题采纳率:93.8% 举报
1.To the product without texture for painting,the number of spots,which could be coused by oil or dust, on the product depend on their diameter and distribution.According to the surface gloss,we suggest that :
φ≤0.3mm,d≥10mm,OK
1.0mm≥φ>0.5mm,d≥50mm:4 spots allowed;(d=the distance between two spots)
0.5mm≥φ>0.3mm,d≥25mm:8 spots allowed;
otherwise conditions,NG
对于不咬花喷油的产品,污点(可能由油污或尘埃引起)的直径和分布决定其数量的多少.我们将根据产品的表面光洁度来定义产品污点数量的验收标准.具体建议如下:
(没说明你们光泽度要求是多少啊)
2.there is an other kind of impurity on the product.It's the silk coused by dust or cloth fiber.Accoding to their lenth(L),we suggest that:
2.0mm≥L>1.5mm,d≥40mm:4 silks allowed;(d=the distance between two silks)
.
还有另外一种表面杂质,它可能是由尘埃或衣物纤维造成的丝状物.我们将根据其长度(L)来定义产品丝状物数量的验收标准.具体建议如下:
3.It is necessary to test the paint adhesion (cross-cut test),our question is whether to use 3M600 to do the test.In additon,do you have other test requairments,just like wear resistance and solvent resistance?
喷漆产品的附着力测试是很有必要的(百格测试),我们的问题是,是否用3M600来做测试?另外,你们是否还有其他测试要求,例如耐磨性测试和耐溶剂性测试?
第四点有点不专业啊,第五点应该放到第一点提出来.没时间搞了,下次 .另外再加点分,累
1年前
追问
9
源源径流
举报
谢谢!你放心,翻译完了给你100分,说到做到。各位网友见证! 今天上午能否抽空帮忙再翻译下么?我下午就要提交给客户了。 谢谢!
举报
钮枯碌
4.因为膜-=厚也应该作为管控标准之一,所以我觉得你说的理由不是很充分。弱=-势供应商的话建议委婉 点:做一系列色差样板再签限度样品(可以偷改实验数据说明难度嘛,呵呵);强势供应商或者关系比较 好,可以直接告诉他做不到,否则成本要大幅上升。 In regarding to chromatic aberration(∆):It's very difficult to reach our goal under the existing specifications.This will lead to the large increase in the cost of product . So that we suggest extending to the General Specification or signing limited samples.( We will take a series of samples with different chromatic aberration,in order to be convenient to choose appropriate value for you.) 关于色差:在现有规格下要达成我们的目标,实在是太困难了。这将导致产品成本的大幅上升。所以我们 建议放宽至通用规范或签定限度样品。(我们会做一系列不同色差的样品,以方便你们选择合适的色差值 ,“比较强势的话就不要这段了吧,有点自找麻烦”)。