Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutt

[Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940,author Bharati Mukherjee has] lived in England and Canada,and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.
(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940,author Bharati Mukherjee has
(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988,she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940,author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has
(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988,author Bharati Mukherjee
(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988,author Bharati
答：C
译：作家BM,1940年生于加尔各答,1988年入美国籍.她在英国和加拿大生活过.1961年初次来到美国进衣阿华作家创作室学习.
析：
since与完成式连用,且时序颠倒,排除A
选项B代词she先于Bharati Mukherjee 不爽,且前一分句时序仍是颠倒,很不爽.译出来“88年入了美国籍之后,也40年出生了.时空穿越吗?排除B
选项D的第一个being纯属多余
in 1940应当用过去分词而不用现在分词完成式,since应与完成式连用,排除E
正确选项C用了Done,s v o;s v1 and v2.句子逻辑清晰,易懂.
问：对于A项,我的疑问是
1)A如果还原后句子是不是：author is being a United States citizen since 1988 and was born in Calcutta in 1940
答：不是.应是：As she was a United States citizen since 1988 and was born in Calcutta in 1940,.分词短语作状语,应还原成相应的状语从句.不管是你的is being 还是我的was ..,与since 1988都扭不在一起.be作“是”解释,是没有进行时态的.
2)being和born为何不能平行,这里being后面接的名词,而不是形容词,感觉更像动名词而不像现在分词,是因为这个关系吗?
答：不是现在分词短语和过去分词短语不能并列,而是since 1988这个时间状语决定了前一分词不能用一般式.还有时序填倒等等问题.另这个being 不可能是动名词,be后面接形容词和接名词,都是系表结构.（He is clever; He is a student.),动名词是相当于名词的.只能理解成两个分词短语并列,作状语.
3）看有的解释说正确选项C,born 是being born的省略,我并不认同,因为OG的解释是being born是反复的动作,而bron是瞬间动词,我的理解是bron就是过去分词,如果还原直接是句子主语作逻辑主语,author was born in Calcutta in 1940,不知这样的理解是否正确?
答：born 是过去分词,且不表示动作,表动作的过去分词是borne 如She has borne 3 children.
born只能作表语,表状态.它不是being born的省略.后才为现在分词.当然如果是形容词的话,是需要being 的,如Being ill,she couldn't come to school.一般不能只用ill,...,尽管这里的born与ill一样是作形容词用的.便born的本质是过去分词.
你的理解正确.OG是谁?乱讲!
ETS的解释：C is best.The first clause presents its information clearly and in logical sequence.The use of a semicolon to set apart the remaining information further assists the clarity of the sentence.In A,the phrase Being...and born violates parallelism and oddly presents its information in reverse chronological order.Choice B illogically suggests that upon her birth in 1940,Mukherjee had already been a United States citizen since 1988.In D and E,the use of progressive forms (Being born,having been.Having been born,and being) implies continuous action,a notion that is not appropriate to the facts being presented.Also,these forms do not establish a logical time sequence,suggesting,for example,that Mukherjee had been a United States citizen before she lived in England and Canada and first came to the United States.