英语翻译We assessed the validity of our subsyndromal categories
英语翻译
We assessed the validity of our subsyndromal categories in two ways.First,we compared all the cross-disorder phenotypic correlations using the original dichotomous full-syndrome variables (tetrachoric correlations) with the three-category variables (polychoric correlations);
95% confidence intervals for these two correlations overlapped for 65 of 66 correlations.Second,using a multiple-threshold model in PRELIS 2.3 (36),we tested whether the three categories represented differing levels of severity on a single continuum of liability.This test failed at the 5% level three of 46 times,consistent with chance expectations (37).
We assessed the validity of our subsyndromal categories in two ways.First,we compared all the cross-disorder phenotypic correlations using the original dichotomous full-syndrome variables (tetrachoric correlations) with the three-category variables (polychoric correlations);
95% confidence intervals for these two correlations overlapped for 65 of 66 correlations.Second,using a multiple-threshold model in PRELIS 2.3 (36),we tested whether the three categories represented differing levels of severity on a single continuum of liability.This test failed at the 5% level three of 46 times,consistent with chance expectations (37).
赞 fffgg2rrr2 幼苗
共回答了17个问题采纳率：82.4% 举报
试译如下：
我们通过两种方式来评估我们的“亚综合征抑郁分类”有效性.
首先,我们借助原始的二分全综合症变量（相关性）以及三类变量（多分格相关性）,比较所有的错位表型相关,这两种相关性95%置信区间的重叠率为66个有65个重叠.
第二,在“PRELIS 2.3 (36)”中使用“多重阈值模式”.我们测试了三种类型在单个倾向的连续性上是否代表不同水平的严重程度.
该测试在第三级别46次中的出错率约为5%,这是“机会期望”(37).能容纳的范围.
我们通过两种方式来评估我们的“亚综合征抑郁分类”有效性.
首先,我们借助原始的二分全综合症变量（相关性）以及三类变量（多分格相关性）,比较所有的错位表型相关,这两种相关性95%置信区间的重叠率为66个有65个重叠.
第二,在“PRELIS 2.3 (36)”中使用“多重阈值模式”.我们测试了三种类型在单个倾向的连续性上是否代表不同水平的严重程度.
该测试在第三级别46次中的出错率约为5%,这是“机会期望”(37).能容纳的范围.
1年前
6
可能相似的问题
你能帮帮他们吗