英文电影观后感1.80-90词之间冰河世纪3 冒牌天神2要两篇！冰河不要了，改哈利波特与混血王子

Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo.In fact,until Shrek,2001’s rollicking success,I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen.What is surprising,is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights,apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s,Inc.'s second rate,half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie,one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs,pterodactyl eggs,and sympathetic cavemen.This time,it’s the ice age,and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man.Strangely enough,in this early world,animals can talk,and humans cannot.But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby,wooly mammoth (Ray Romano),saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary),and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually,Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen.Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters,Inc.; or even the gooey,gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters.No hint of photo-realism here.It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King.Actually,I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners.Some of them are even quite funny.If that is all that we’re going for here,then I suppose I’m all for it.But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness,which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation.Frankly,I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters.The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living,breathing,creatures.It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt,soft touches.
Thankfully,the main characters are animals,which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels.As a result,what slapstick there is,is highly entertaining.Sure,Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular.But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland,boring,and uninspired,as is the almost laughably bad animation.The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos.Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs,but unless you’re under 5,you’ll be bored with everything else.
看看行不行
《冒牌天神2》观后感:
This should've gone straight to video.Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty.It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with.Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.
Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means),so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.
It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.