解决这篇英语阅读~65为什么选D

解决这篇英语阅读~65为什么选D
This brief book is aimed at high school students ,but speaks to anyone learning at any stage of life.
Its formal ,serious style closely matches its content ,a school-masterly book on schooling .The author ,W .H .Armstrong ,starts with the basics :reading and writing .In his opinion ,reading doesn’t just mean recognizing each word on the page ; it means taking in the information,digesting it and incorporating it into oneself just as one digests a sandwich and makes it a part of himself .The goal is to bring the information back to life ,not just to treat it as dead facts on paper from dead trees .Reading and writing cannot be completely separated from each other ; in fact ,the aim of reading is to express the information you have got from the text .I’ve seen it again and again :some-one who can’t express an idea after reading a text is just as ineffective as someone who hasn’t read it at all.
Only a third of the book remains after that discussion ,which Armstrong devotes to specific tips for studying languages ,math ,science and history .He generally handles these topics thoroughly(透彻地) and equally ,except for some weakness in the science and math sections and a bit too much passion(激情) regarding history to his students ,that was a hundred times more than my history teachers ever got across .To my disappointment ,in this part of the book he ignores the arts .As a matter of fact ,they demand all the concentration and study that math and science do,though the study differs slightly in kind .Although it’s commonly believed that the arts can only be naturally acquired ,actually ,learning the arts is no more natural than learning French or mathematics.
My other comment is that the text aged.The first edition apparently dates to the 1960s—none of the references(参考文献)seem newer than the late 1950s.As a result,the discussion misses the entire computer age.
These are small points,though,and don’t affect the main discussion.I recommend it to any student and any teacher,including the self-taught student.
65.What is a shortcoming of Armstrong’s work according to the author?D
A.Some ideas are slightly contradictory.
B.There is too much discussion on studying science.
C.The style is too serious.
D.It lacks new information.
温善男子 1年前 已收到4个回答 举报

群hh 幼苗

共回答了12个问题采纳率:83.3% 举报

65题选D:
A.有些想法稍有冲突之处.(这个文中完全没提.)
B.对学习科学讨论得太多了.(不是的,大部分内容是有关学习的基础知识,只有1/3是讨论学习科学知识的窍门)
C.风格太过严肃.(没有.作者说Its formal ,serious style closely matches its content,该书的严谨风格与内容相得益彰,说明不是太过严肃的)
D.缺乏新信息.(是的.My other comment is that the text aged.As a result,the discussion misses the entire computer age.书的内容过时了,整个电脑时代都未包括在内.缺乏最新的内容)

1年前 追问

2

温善男子 举报

问题是职业是什么

举报 群hh

65题的问题吗?
据作者的意见,Armstrong作品的缺点是什么?
跟职业无关。

neva123 幼苗

共回答了3个问题 举报

"My other comment is that the text aged. The first edition apparently dates to the 1960s—none of the references seem newer than the late 1950s. As a result, the discussion misses the entire computer age."大意是信息太老了,都是20世纪50年代之前的,没有新的信息。选d

1年前

1

885577 幼苗

共回答了60个问题 举报

To my disappointment , in this part of the book he ignores the arts .As a matter of fact ,they demand all the concentration and study that math and science do,though the study differs slightly in kind .

1年前

0

一条大道通马罗 幼苗

共回答了1个问题 举报

答案在文中的表现句:To my disappointment , in this part of the book he ignores the arts .以及 As a result, the discussion misses the entire computer age.

意思就是说,我对这个 Armstrong很失望,因为他的这本书忽略了艺术。还有,讨论少了整个计...

1年前

0
可能相似的问题
Copyright © 2024 YULUCN.COM - 雨露学习互助 - 20 q. 0.037 s. - webmaster@yulucn.com