一些lsat的题,怎么都看不懂呢..

一些lsat的题,怎么都看不懂呢..
1.a former employee of an employer whose products or services are in universal semand and whose customers were obtained by simple house to house solicitation,may solicit those customers of his former employer whose names and addresses he recalls.
2.a business firm which seeks to dominate or controp one or segeral industries thereby ciolates the anti-trust laws.
单词都明白,但脑子就是转不过来,想了半天,转的头都疼了..
英语好的前辈们可以帮翻译一下吗?
初为人父1981 1年前 已收到2个回答 举报

zouxiuqi 幼苗

共回答了23个问题采纳率:87% 举报

第一句讲 一个已经离职的员工可能利用他以前的雇主的客户,因为该雇主的产品较为普通.
第二个很简单啊,一个希望控制或独占一个领域的公司很可能违反了反托拉斯法.

1年前

1

xx阳光247 幼苗

共回答了2个问题 举报

你拼错了许多单词,也或者是题目印错了所以导致你看不懂。
如:semand, controp->control, segeral->several, ciolates->violates

1年前

0
可能相似的问题
Copyright © 2024 YULUCN.COM - 雨露学习互助 - 17 q. 0.017 s. - webmaster@yulucn.com