英语翻译He walked into what his builder's instincts told him wou
英语翻译
He walked into what his builder's instincts told him would soon be a false pond,and he stood there and fingered the charms one last time
这句话是不是写的不对,则么会有俩动词啊.一个主句俩东西,老师不是说是错误的吗.这句话是一个美国人也不是英国作家写的 来着 《可爱的骨头》 .而且我发现她书里充满这种一句话俩动词的句子,是怎么回事啊?是我理解错了,还是老师教错了,难道一句话俩动词的句子 其实是对的?老师讲错了?
,到 pond 之前 怎么理解
那按照一楼的解释的话,一个what ,还是带了俩动词,并且中间没加AND,这不是很错误的吗.what his builder's instincts told him.what would soon be a false pond
也就是说 the thing that his instincts told him.the things that would soon be a false pond.把两句话整合成了一句,the thing 或者说 what ,在句子里又做宾语又做主语.很莫名其妙 还是比较统一二楼的 把中间作为插入语理解,我觉得这样理解至少在语法上还是说的通的至少
因为按照一楼那样的理解 我觉得是说成这样比较合理：he walked into what his builder's instincts told him,what would soon be a false pond .至少也该这样说吧,把what 至少再重复一下.真的有这种语法?存在即合理?只用一个what 既当主语又当宾语?
其实现在我也有点开始同意你的解释,也同意插入语的解释,但是我还是弄不清,到底是哪种.到底该用什么语法来解释.这句话如果别人说出来 带声音那种就马上能理解,写到纸上的好多东西 本来很简单的 我就是看着迷糊.归类为语感算了
He walked into what his builder's instincts told him would soon be a false pond,and he stood there and fingered the charms one last time
这句话是不是写的不对,则么会有俩动词啊.一个主句俩东西,老师不是说是错误的吗.这句话是一个美国人也不是英国作家写的 来着 《可爱的骨头》 .而且我发现她书里充满这种一句话俩动词的句子,是怎么回事啊?是我理解错了,还是老师教错了,难道一句话俩动词的句子 其实是对的?老师讲错了?
,到 pond 之前 怎么理解
那按照一楼的解释的话,一个what ,还是带了俩动词,并且中间没加AND,这不是很错误的吗.what his builder's instincts told him.what would soon be a false pond
也就是说 the thing that his instincts told him.the things that would soon be a false pond.把两句话整合成了一句,the thing 或者说 what ,在句子里又做宾语又做主语.很莫名其妙 还是比较统一二楼的 把中间作为插入语理解,我觉得这样理解至少在语法上还是说的通的至少
因为按照一楼那样的理解 我觉得是说成这样比较合理：he walked into what his builder's instincts told him,what would soon be a false pond .至少也该这样说吧,把what 至少再重复一下.真的有这种语法?存在即合理?只用一个what 既当主语又当宾语?
其实现在我也有点开始同意你的解释,也同意插入语的解释,但是我还是弄不清,到底是哪种.到底该用什么语法来解释.这句话如果别人说出来 带声音那种就马上能理解,写到纸上的好多东西 本来很简单的 我就是看着迷糊.归类为语感算了
赞 共回答了19个问题采纳率：73.7% 举报
he walked into what (that his builder's instincts told him,what感觉类似同位语从句的东西,头痛了,不管啦.)would soon be a false pond
可能刚才说错了?打字有误?不管啦,不想继续纠缠下去了.
你喜欢就没办法了,
至少我讲明白了,
插入语,你喜欢就喜欢吧.
我个人觉得,插入语是没法明确归到具体语法成分里面的.
it ,to my surprise ,turned out to be.
to my surprise
这种,我觉得才是插入语.
嗯,不多说了,要去抢分了,一小时好几百近千啊.现在题好多.
这里面有个复杂的从句,这句话写得比较经典,句法用得相当精彩.
and he stood there and fingered the charms one last time
他站在那里,手指最后一次触碰那个护身符
charms n. 符咒；护身符（charm的复数形式）；吸引力
这个并列句就不用说了.
只说前面:
He walked into ( what would soon be a false pond),
这是个宾语从句, what 在从句中做主语.
what后面跟了一个省了that的定语从句,来修释what :
what (that his builder's instincts told him)
他走进了那个, 他做为建筑家的直觉告诉他的, 不一会就证明是个假的池塘的 地方(即:what).
可能刚才说错了?打字有误?不管啦,不想继续纠缠下去了.
你喜欢就没办法了,
至少我讲明白了,
插入语,你喜欢就喜欢吧.
我个人觉得,插入语是没法明确归到具体语法成分里面的.
it ,to my surprise ,turned out to be.
to my surprise
这种,我觉得才是插入语.
嗯,不多说了,要去抢分了,一小时好几百近千啊.现在题好多.
这里面有个复杂的从句,这句话写得比较经典,句法用得相当精彩.
and he stood there and fingered the charms one last time
他站在那里,手指最后一次触碰那个护身符
charms n. 符咒；护身符（charm的复数形式）；吸引力
这个并列句就不用说了.
只说前面:
He walked into ( what would soon be a false pond),
这是个宾语从句, what 在从句中做主语.
what后面跟了一个省了that的定语从句,来修释what :
what (that his builder's instincts told him)
他走进了那个, 他做为建筑家的直觉告诉他的, 不一会就证明是个假的池塘的 地方(即:what).
1年前
3
可能相似的问题
你能帮帮他们吗
精彩回答