求高人帮我写份英文演讲稿我是某医院的一名医护人员,院里举办了一个活动,有一个演讲比赛.演讲内用没有限制,但是要积极向上,

你好, lovsp.
这是一篇经过摘取加工的文章,先从学术上关于医德的定义和现代医生与病患的关系入手,指出医德核心内容,最后积极向上表示尽心尽责树立医德,为病患服务.希望能帮得上你的忙.
Six of the values that commonly apply to medical ethics discussions are:
Autonomy - the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment. (Voluntas aegroti suprema lex.)
Beneficence - a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient. (Salus aegroti suprema lex.)
Non-maleficence - "first, do no harm" (primum non nocere).
Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality).
Dignity - the patient (and the person treating the patient) have the right to dignity.
Truthfulness and honesty - the concept of informed consent has increased in importance since the historical events of the Doctors' Trial of the Nuremberg trials and Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
Confidentiality is commonly applied to conversations between doctors and patients. This concept is commonly known as patient-physician privilege.Traditionally, medical ethics has viewed the duty of confidentiality as a relatively non-negotiable tenet of medical practice. More recently, critics like Jacob Appel have argued for a more nuanced approach to the duty that acknowledges the need for flexibility in many cases.
Traditional medical oaths and codes prescribe a physician's character, motives, and duties. Typically they portray ideal physicians as devoted to the welfare of patients and to advancement of the medical profession and medical knowledge, responding compassionately to the suffering of patients, humbly mindful of the limits of their curative powers and the harms they may unintentionally cause. The Hippocratic injunction "Strive to help, but above all, do no harm" is the ruling maxim. In current discussion, this maxim has been codified in oft-cited "principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence."
Missunderstandings still exists though we'd still adhere to our medical ethics and responsiable for our patients.